|
|
Yeti1181
Referee Edmonton Oilers |
|
|
Location: I'm AWESOME, AB Joined: 07.27.2012
|
|
|
Fisty
Edit: suck it nuckers you all. |
|
seabass21
Boston Bruins |
|
|
Location: Life is nasty, brutish and short. T.Hobbes, BC Joined: 10.22.2010
|
|
|
They looked disinterested for most of the game. I will count the 2 pre season games...11 losses in row to the clowns in San Jose, just horrible
Oh, and 2nd |
|
LeftCoaster
|
|
|
Location: Island City, BC Joined: 07.03.2009
|
|
|
LeftCoaster
|
|
|
Location: Island City, BC Joined: 07.03.2009
|
|
|
They looked disinterested for most of the game. I will count the 2 pre season games...11 losses in row to the clowns in San Jose, just horrible
Oh, and 2nd - seabass21
I believe there's currently a significant drop off in talent once that first line takes a seat. It's not so much lack of interest, it's lack of top six talent! |
|
Zupes
San Jose Sharks |
|
Location: Los Angeles, CA Joined: 09.02.2012
|
|
|
That awkward moment when you can't muster one goal on J.S. Giguere, and one of the worst defensive units. LOL
They looked disinterested for most of the game. I will count the 2 pre season games...11 losses in row to the clowns in San Jose, just horrible
Oh, and 2nd - seabass21 |
|
Iggysbff
Vegas Golden Knights |
|
|
Location: Peter Chiarelli is a fking moron, Calgary, AB Joined: 07.12.2012
|
|
|
LeftCoaster
|
|
|
Location: Island City, BC Joined: 07.03.2009
|
|
|
What's your folks take on the Rags? AV the next coach taken to the wood shed? - Iggysbff
Haven't seen a game, so can't offer an educated comment...but I can't say I'm surprised. |
|
BlazinMike
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: Chicago, IL Joined: 05.08.2013
|
|
|
Edler still thinks AV is the coach, pulling the typical Canuck garbage. Haha, im partially kidding because i havent been following the Canucks really too much. Honestly though i cant say i was surprised when i read that one of the Canucks might be facing a suspension. |
|
hillbillydeluxe
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: I didn't read it , BC Joined: 09.21.2013
|
|
|
I believe there's currently a significant drop off in talent once that first line takes a seat. It's not so much lack of interest, it's lack of top six talent! - LeftCoaster
Need two lines to consistently produce or be a threat. Damn the sharks are deep.
We need another trigger man in the top 6. I think someone mentioned Torts did not breaking up the Sedins again, I was hoping to see if it would spur some life into the Canucks in the 3rd period.
Wondering what the lineup will look like with Kassian and then Burrows' return. Stanton hasn't disappointed or drawn any attention for the wrong reasons. Picking Alberts to be sent down/waivers. Hoping Schroeder is given an opportunity. |
|
LeftCoaster
|
|
|
Location: Island City, BC Joined: 07.03.2009
|
|
|
Edler still thinks AV is the coach, pulling the typical Canuck garbage. Haha, im partially kidding because i havent been following the Canucks really too much. Honestly though i cant say i was surprised when i read that one of the Canucks might be facing a suspension. - BlazinMike
Take a look at the hit before commenting, it's really not that bad at all. They're just trying to be diligent about head-shots, which this IMO was borderline with no intent whatsoever. |
|
Isles_since_6
New York Islanders |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 07.13.2009
|
|
|
Take a look at the hit before commenting, it's really not that bad at all. They're just trying to be diligent about head-shots, which this IMO was borderline with no intent whatsoever. - LeftCoaster
agreed. I still suspect a fine but I'd be surprised with an actual suspension.
|
|
Gullzy
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 02.07.2013
|
|
|
Need two lines to consistently produce or be a threat. Damn the sharks are deep.
We need another trigger man in the top 6. I think someone mentioned Torts did not breaking up the Sedins again, I was hoping to see if it would spur some life into the Canucks in the 3rd period.
Wondering what the lineup will look like with Kassian and then Burrows' return. Stanton hasn't disappointed or drawn any attention for the wrong reasons. Picking Alberts to be sent down/waivers. Hoping Schroeder is given an opportunity. - hillbillydeluxe
Honestly I'm not even worried about this season. I see a team that's going to spend this season adjusting to a new coach, and system; whilst management locks up the Sedin twins long term.
We will see the "new" Canucks next season after MG brings in a UFA top 6 guy, with Gaunce, Horvat, Shinkaruk, Jensen, and Corrado all having a great chance to make the team.
Edit: http://canucksarmy.com/20...ks-weekly-prospect-report
Article detailing Canucks prospects and their season so far. |
|
CanUSA17
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Schaumburg, IL Joined: 10.11.2010
|
|
|
Take a look at the hit before commenting, it's really not that bad at all. They're just trying to be diligent about head-shots, which this IMO was borderline with no intent whatsoever. - LeftCoaster
He's a Hawks fan, he doesn't think before commenting. |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
Edler still thinks AV is the coach, pulling the typical Canuck garbage. Haha, im partially kidding because i havent been following the Canucks really too much. Honestly though i cant say i was surprised when i read that one of the Canucks might be facing a suspension. - BlazinMike
It's pathetic that it's even being reviewed:
- Did NOT extend his elbow
- Did NOT jump off of the ice
- Did NOT even make direct contact with Hertl's head
If this is a suspension then I'm done even commenting or trying to comprehend what the hell this league is doing until some new people are in charge. |
|
BlazinMike
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: Chicago, IL Joined: 05.08.2013
|
|
|
Take a look at the hit before commenting, it's really not that bad at all. They're just trying to be diligent about head-shots, which this IMO was borderline with no intent whatsoever. - LeftCoaster
I saw the hit, just havent been following the canucks in general. I read Edler could be facing a suspension then looked up the hit. At best id say you could argue that the shark player had his head down, but to me it looked like Edler's shoulder hit the guy in the head (as evidence by the helmet flying off). Granted helmets have been knocked off by shoulder to shoulder hits. All im saying is I wasnt surprised to see that a canuck COULD be facing a suspension. No hiding it here, i dont like the canucks. Just my view point |
|
LeftCoaster
|
|
|
Location: Island City, BC Joined: 07.03.2009
|
|
|
agreed. I still suspect a fine but I'd be surprised with an actual suspension. - Isles_since_6
Yes I agree...a fine, which would be a shot across his bow as they say. |
|
Isles_since_6
New York Islanders |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 07.13.2009
|
|
|
It's pathetic that it's even being reviewed:
- Did NOT extend his elbow
- Did NOT jump off of the ice
- Did NOT even make direct contact with Hertl's head
If this is a suspension then I'm done even commenting or trying to comprehend what the hell this league is doing until some new people are in charge. - Nucker101
you're correct on the first two but dead wrong on the last one. Clearly visible that edler's shoulder made first contact with Hertl's helmet, popping it off.
no intent I agree, but it did make principle contact to the head. without the intent and without the hit causing injury, I see a fine. |
|
LeftCoaster
|
|
|
Location: Island City, BC Joined: 07.03.2009
|
|
|
I saw the hit, just havent been following the canucks in general. I read Edler could be facing a suspension then looked up the hit. At best id say you could argue that the shark player had his head down, but to me it looked like Edler's shoulder hit the guy in the head (as evidence by the helmet flying off). Granted helmets have been knocked off by shoulder to shoulder hits. All im saying is I wasnt surprised to see that a canuck COULD be facing a suspension. No hiding it here, i dont like the canucks. Just my view point - BlazinMike
Fair enough. |
|
Isles_since_6
New York Islanders |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 07.13.2009
|
|
|
Yes I agree...a fine, which would be a shot across him bow as they say. - LeftCoaster
the fine to send the message that the league is tough on headshots, and no games to edler because frankly it wasn't a hit that deserved a suspension.
|
|
kneughter
Atlanta Thrashers |
|
|
Location: “yup call came in, but as pe Joined: 07.14.2009
|
|
|
It's pathetic that it's even being reviewed:
- Did NOT extend his elbow
- Did NOT jump off of the ice
- Did NOT even make direct contact with Hertl's head
If this is a suspension then I'm done even commenting or trying to comprehend what the hell this league is doing until some new people are in charge. - Nucker101
Agreed. I think his recent history might ignite a 1 or 2 game suspension. The fact Kassian got 8 games for something that is tough to prove was even deliberate is beyond me. So I won't be surprised whatever happens. |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
I saw the hit, just havent been following the canucks in general. I read Edler could be facing a suspension then looked up the hit. At best id say you could argue that the shark player had his head down, but to me it looked like Edler's shoulder hit the guy in the head (as evidence by the helmet flying off). Granted helmets have been knocked off by shoulder to shoulder hits. All im saying is I wasnt surprised to see that a canuck COULD be facing a suspension. No hiding it here, i dont like the canucks. Just my view point - BlazinMike
Grazed the head IMO, and Hertl moved pretty quickly at the last second, originally Edler had him lined up for a should to shoulder head...maybe that's just me being helplessly bias though. |
|
kneughter
Atlanta Thrashers |
|
|
Location: “yup call came in, but as pe Joined: 07.14.2009
|
|
|
you're correct on the first two but dead wrong on the last one. Clearly visible that edler's shoulder made first contact with Hertl's helmet, popping it off.
no intent I agree, but it did make principle contact to the head. without the intent and without the hit causing injury, I see a fine. - Isles_since_6
One angle gives a better view of hit and definitely makes it look like he hit his shoulder and came up which caused the helmet to pop off. You don't need to hit a players head to have a helmet come off. Hertl didn't even fall |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
you're correct on the first two but dead wrong on the last one. Clearly visible that edler's shoulder made first contact with Hertl's helmet, popping it off.
no intent I agree, but it did make principle contact to the head. without the intent and without the hit causing injury, I see a fine. - Isles_since_6
Well by direct I meant actually got a good piece of him(some angles only show shoulder contact). Seemed to me like Hertl completely changed Edler's angle by moving out of the way at the last second. It's similar to the boarding incidents when a player is standing sideways and once an opposing player commits to hitting him, the "victim" player turns his back to him at the last half second drawing a penalty and potentially more. |
|
Gullzy
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 02.07.2013
|
|
|
Grazed the head IMO, and Hertl moved pretty quickly at the last second, originally Edler had him lined up for a should to shoulder head...maybe that's just me being helplessly bias though. - Nucker101
Hertl is reaching for the puck right before he gets hit. The kid just put himself in a vulnerable position, and I don't see a scenerio where Edler could do something different.
I don't think he gets suspended. |
|